Home / Consent Law
Consent Law
Judgments, consultation responses and claims data are written for lawyers and policymakers. These articles translate them into what a practitioner should actually do on Monday morning, free, referenced, and updated as the law moves.
Interactive
Scroll-driven walkthroughs of how a claim unfolds and how the law got here. Three minutes each, built to work on any device.
Interactive · the claim
Follow one dermal filler claim through three years, disclosure and the expert witnesses. Then flip the switch and watch the same case end the other way, because the consent was documented.
Walk the journey →Interactive · the law
Watch the standard climb from Bolam in 1957 to Montgomery, McCulloch and the England licensing scheme, and see what each case now demands of your records.
Watch it rise →Start Here
Consent law, incoming regulation, and how claims are actually won and lost. Read these three and you understand the terrain better than most of the sector.
Case Law · 7 min read
The 2015 Supreme Court judgment replaced the reasonable doctor with the reasonable patient, and McCulloch (2023) added a duty around alternatives. What the test actually requires, treatment by treatment.
Read the article →Regulation · 6 min read
Traffic-light tiers, CQC registration for the highest-risk procedures, and a realistic timeline from the 2025 consultation response to licences on walls. What to prepare before applications open.
Read the article →Claims · 6 min read
More than a thousand claims at one UK insurer in five years, and the insurer's own view that unclear communication and poorly documented consent drive them, not clinical error. The documentation that changes the ending.
Read the article →More articles are in preparation, including consent in ophthalmology and oculoplastics, record-keeping standards, and complaint first-response. Join the waitlist to be told when each one publishes.
Case law, explained
We have split them the way a medico-legal expert does: the authorities relied on today, and the older cases that show how the law got here. Each is written in plain English.
In use today
Consent · [2015]
The patient-centred test that rewrote consent, and what "material risk" means treatment by treatment.
Read the explainer →Standard of care · [1957]
When a responsible body of opinion protects you, and why it no longer governs how you consent.
Read the explainer →Standard of care · [1955]
The Scottish standard of care an expert still reaches for, and the three things a claim must prove.
Read the explainer →Consent · [2023]
The most recent clarification: the duty to discuss the reasonable alternatives, including doing nothing.
Read the explainer →How the law got here
Important history, cited rarely in current practice. They explain why consent is now judged the way it is.
Consent · [1985]
The old, doctor-centred consent standard that Montgomery swept away, and why it still lingers in forms.
Read the explainer →Standard of care · [1997]
The logic test that sharpened Bolam, and why your reasoning has to withstand scrutiny.
Read the explainer →Causation · [2004]
Why a warning you did not give can decide a case, even after faultless treatment.
Read the explainer →The Medicolegal Readiness Score
A five-minute diagnostic scored across the five pillars of defensibility, consent, records, consultation, complaints and regulation. Free, private, and uncomfortably precise.
Take the Readiness Score →
Stay Ahead of the Law
The waitlist doubles as the Cleritas briefing list. When case law moves, when the licensing scheme takes its next step, when new templates and events launch, you hear first.